TV interview for our published college textbook for environmental science. https://app.frame.io/reviews/18c27ef0-5523-412f-a82f-99f956bd2945/c9929897-db6a-456d-acef-c3e4a1f3b34d This was recorded in July.
On August 31st, 2023, the first textbook off the printing press arrived. It will be approved. Then it will ship to Amazon, Barns and Noble and College Bookstores.
On 7/5/2023 we sent our high school textbook with the same title to the
publisher and to emails of the National Science Teacher Association. They had
read only access to the publication while written.
On 4/11/2023 a letter to President Biden was delivered with a flyer of this college textbook.
On 5/19/2023 we received and approved the final artwork from the publisher.
On 5/14/2023 we started a high school textbook and send viewable links to the National Science Teachers Association emails so they can view the progress.
On 11/22/2022 We received the Proofs from the publisher for this textbook and sent back small changes. This link is a podcast for an interview about the textbook. https://www.heartland.org/multimedia/podcasts/is-the-ipcc-spreading-science-fiction-guest-dave-white The website climatecrisischanged.com if for Professors who teach this to get PowerPoints and other aids to help teach it.
The e-book is $89.95 and may be purchased and downloaded now. The paper hardback version needs to be pre-ordered for $149.95 plus shipping. Shipping to mainland USA only.
This textbook will be published by Dorrance Publishing Co, book publishing. Lauriat Publishing section. Library of Congress ISBN is 979-8-88812-127-6 The E-ISBN is 979-8-88812-627-1 Dorrance is the oldest book publishing company in the United States. Over 100 years old and strong. This textbook will be on Amazon and Barns and Noble in May 2023 for higher prices. It is scheduled to be taught at many Colleges by Enviromental Science Professors Fall of 2023
The textbook title is: Climate Crisis Changed the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reports are deliberate science fiction.
We dedicated this book to the 23 PhD’s on our IPCC review team.
A college textbook for every environmental college class.
Authors White, Wysmuller, Plummer, Beers, McMenemie
Chapter 1. Carbon dioxide equilibrium. NetZeroCO2E = 8.6 billion tons of photosynthesis. Web search NetZeroCO2e and most links go to this.
July 2022 there was a story in Reuters News about how two democratic congressmen were trying to rewrite the NetZero CO2 targets to 2050 instead of 2030. This guy Brett H. from the center of Biological diversity said, “ No, no. They can’t do that. We need to keep the targets at 2030.” It was 4 pm our time. I found his office on the east coast so I called him and left a message. To my surprise he called me back 5 minutes later. He said they were packing to go on vacation for two weeks and he would call me again when he was back. I said I just had one quick question. “What is the numerical value of NetZero CO2.” He laughed and said No One knows. We wrote and published the first atmospheric CO2 equilibrium manuscript to define NetZero CO2. The numerical value is 8.6 gt/yr. from massive deforestation and garbage, waste and polluted rivers into the oceans. It started peer review in a top journal in February 2022 and when published it rocked the Scientific world.
I have presented it at 4 climate conferences as a Plenary address. Also at Rotary in Hillsboro Oregon. They all agree we need to plant trees. Sustainability and resilience are lies of the IPCC who reports are deliberate science fiction.
If web searching for NetZeroCO2e you will find most links go to our manuscript. The published link is here. https://www.omicsonline.org/open-access/the-essential-role-of-photosynthesis-in-defining-net-zero-carbon-dioxide-emissions-for-equilibrium-calculations.pdf
Chapter 2. Green House gases. Methane is much less greenhouse gas. Water vapor is largest effect. See greenhouse gas page on cctruth.org
Table 7.2 page 3 of http://irina.eas.gatech.edu/EAS8803_SPRING2012/Lec7.pdf
Chapter 3. Astrophysical warming. Cooling in the south and warming in the north where 90% of people live. See the data page on cctruth.org.
Chapter 4. Residence time of atmospheric carbon dioxide. It takes 150 years for anything we do with emissions of carbon dioxide to have an effect. Still no effect from the Oil Embargo from the 1970’s which would have lowered carbon dioxide emissions by 90% for almost two years.
Chapter 5. Statistical analysis.
Chapter 6. NOAA Mauna Loa data and fraud.
Chapter 7. NiCE fix for Southeast USA storms. Storms stopped in 2022.
Chapter 8 Global Sea rise. 1.4 mm/yr linear and not accelerating. No reliability in NOAA Satellites.
Chapter 9 Photosynthesis issues.
Chapter 10 Atmospheric carbon dioxide doesn’t freeze in the mesosphere.
Chapter 11 NIST and photosynthesis experiment.
Chapter 12 Ocean is not a sink for atmospheric carbon dioxide.
Chapter 13 The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reports are deliberate science fiction.
They published loosely referenced manuscripts in Nature Climate Change Journal then circular referenced them in their reports. This is not science. Also buried on page 101 their only probability for their solution to work by lowering emissions of carbon dioxide is 66%. Also lowering by 45% will only get us to 19.8 billion tons per year. The equilibrium is 8.6 billion tons of photosynthesis per year. That chapter link is https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg3/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGIII_FullReport.pdf This is paragraph B.1.3 on Page 6 of the report. It had no references to anything. Only footnotes. References are like this (White et Al, Climate Change Journal 2021). The references at the chapter end are not unlike other chapter references. Loosely referenced manuscripts in Nature Climate Change while Adam Yealey was chief editor. His PhD is in Political science. He let the IPCC published these manuscripts. In June of 2020 we notified the board of Nature Climate Change and they fired him the next day. Additionally, the scientific consensus is 33% not 97%. The assertion that 97% of scientists agree with the IPCC is wrong! This high consensus was touted because the three hundred manuscripts published between 2009 and 2013 were chosen for review on the basis of their seeming conformity to a certain point of view. Rejected for the review and survey of scientists were the more than seven hundred manuscripts written by scientists who had different statistics and conclusions from the ones that were wanted. Therefore, the agreeing part is 33%. We are 67%ers. This can be discovered on the untruthful climate.nasa.gov consensus page.
Chapter 14 Videos to watch
Chapter 15 Predatory Journals are a lie.
I contacted the National Academy of Sciences, spoke to Dr. Mike Kuperberg who is the Executive Director of the U.S. Global Change Research Program (USGCRP), He saw the correct science in what I present at Climate Change Conference. He sent it to the other scientists in their office. Their consensus was to have me get a team and participate in the annual “Expert and Government Review (EAGR)” program of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reports.
I led a team of PhD’s who’s ranks soon swelled from myself to 30 other scientists who are also participating in the writing of this college textbook. Together we participated in the “EAGR” program and we unanimously found all kinds of garbage science in their reports. Also, we had Adam Yeeley, the chief editor of Nature Climate Change fired. His PhD was in political science. He let the IPCC scientists publish loosely referenced manuscripts and circular reference them in their reports. This is not science.
The IPCC reports are deliberate science fiction. The IPCC writers identify themselves as climate experts and inform governments globally in their reports on what to believe about climate change. These false reports lead to false government policies being made that negatively impact every person and business around the globe through unnecessary economic restrictions and taxation. Chapter 13 has links to the IPCC reports and describes exactly where we found every garbage science in each report. Working group threes report was the best with only a few errors. Working group 1 and 2 reports were mostly garbage.
Chapter 15 explains how predatoary journals are a lie!